Scored by
Tax Efficiency
Asset Protection
Privacy
Treaty Access
Ease of Setup
1 = Low    5 = High
🇵🇦
Panama
Territorial Tax  ·  Foundation Jurisdiction
4.6
Overall
Tax Efficiency
5
Asset Protection
5
Privacy
4
Treaty Access
3
Ease of Setup
5
Strengths
  • ✓Zero tax on all foreign-source income
  • ✓Private Interest Foundation, strongest creditor shield available
  • ✓Colon Free Trade Zone for international commerce
  • ✓Fast incorporation, low annual cost
Weaknesses
  • ✕Limited tax treaty network vs. European hubs
  • ✕Reputation risk requires careful structuring narrative
  • ✕Substance requirements increasing under OECD pressure
🇦🇪
Dubai (UAE)
Zero-Tax Residency  ·  Free Zone Hub
4.4
Overall
Tax Efficiency
5
Asset Protection
4
Privacy
3
Treaty Access
5
Ease of Setup
4
Strengths
  • ✓0% personal income tax, 0% capital gains
  • ✓90+ double tax treaties including major economies
  • ✓DIFC and ADGM offer common law legal frameworks
  • ✓Strong residency visa pathway for HNWIs
Weaknesses
  • ✕9% corporate tax introduced 2023 (free zones retain exemption)
  • ✕UBO register maintained, limited third-party access
  • ✕Substance requirements for free zone companies tightening
🇻🇬
British Virgin Islands
Offshore Holding  ·  Zero-Tax
4.0
Overall
Tax Efficiency
5
Asset Protection
4
Privacy
4
Treaty Access
2
Ease of Setup
5
Strengths
  • ✓No corporate tax, no capital gains, no inheritance tax
  • ✓Most widely used offshore holding vehicle globally
  • ✓Extremely fast and low-cost incorporation
Weaknesses
  • ✕Almost no tax treaty network
  • ✕Moving toward public beneficial ownership register
  • ✕High-profile jurisdiction, increased scrutiny from home tax authorities
🇰🇾
Cayman Islands
Fund Domicile  ·  Zero-Tax
3.8
Overall
Tax Efficiency
5
Asset Protection
4
Privacy
4
Treaty Access
2
Ease of Setup
3
Strengths
  • ✓Global standard for hedge funds and private equity
  • ✓No direct taxation of any kind
  • ✓Sophisticated legal and professional services infrastructure
Weaknesses
  • ✕Higher compliance cost than BVI for non-fund structures
  • ✕Minimal tax treaty access
  • ✕FATF grey-listed in 2021; removed 2024 but reputational impact remains
🇨🇾
Cyprus
EU Holding  ·  IP Box
4.0
Overall
Tax Efficiency
4
Asset Protection
3
Privacy
3
Treaty Access
5
Ease of Setup
4
Strengths
  • ✓12.5% corporate tax, lowest in the EU
  • ✓65+ double tax treaties; EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive access
  • ✓IP box regime at effective 2.5% on qualifying IP income
Weaknesses
  • ✕EU beneficial ownership register reduces privacy
  • ✕Reputational legacy from 2013 banking crisis
  • ✕Asset protection weaker than offshore alternatives
🇨🇭
Switzerland
Wealth Management  ·  Holding
3.8
Overall
Tax Efficiency
4
Asset Protection
4
Privacy
3
Treaty Access
5
Ease of Setup
2
Strengths
  • ✓Cantonal tax competition, effective rates 12-18%
  • ✓Unmatched political neutrality and legal stability
  • ✓Extensive treaty network; global banking infrastructure
Weaknesses
  • ✕High setup and maintenance cost
  • ✕Banking secrecy substantially reduced post-CRS
  • ✕Strict substance requirements for holding companies
🇦🇬
Antigua & Barbuda
IBC  ·  Citizenship by Investment
3.6
Overall
Tax Efficiency
4
Asset Protection
3
Privacy
4
Treaty Access
3
Ease of Setup
4
Strengths
  • ✓No capital gains, inheritance, or wealth taxes
  • ✓No public beneficial ownership register, strong privacy
  • ✓Citizenship by Investment programme, visa-free access to 150+ countries
  • ✓Fast IBC formation under English common law
Weaknesses
  • ✕Limited tax treaty network, no major economy coverage
  • ✕Smaller professional services infrastructure than BVI or Cayman
  • ✕OECD substance requirements increasing compliance burden
🇬🇧
England (UK)
Holding & LLP  ·  Treaty Hub
3.8
Overall
Tax Efficiency
4
Asset Protection
4
Privacy
2
Treaty Access
5
Ease of Setup
4
Strengths
  • ✓Foreign-source income largely exempt, dividends and capital gains on foreign holdings not taxed at the corporate level
  • ✓Substantial Shareholding Exemption on gains from qualifying share disposals
  • ✓130+ double tax treaties, one of the largest networks globally
  • ✓UK LLP fiscally transparent, widely used international investment vehicle
Weaknesses
  • ✕25% corporate rate applies to UK-source profits and trading income
  • ✕Fully public Companies House register, minimal privacy
  • ✕Non-dom regime abolished April 2025, key personal planning route removed
🇭🇰
Hong Kong
Asia-Pacific Gateway  ·  Territorial
4.0
Overall
Tax Efficiency
5
Asset Protection
3
Privacy
3
Treaty Access
4
Ease of Setup
5
Strengths
  • ✓Territorial system, 16.5% only on HK-source profits
  • ✓Gateway to mainland China through unique treaty access
  • ✓Fast, low-cost incorporation with English common law
Weaknesses
  • ✕Increasing PRC political influence, long-term stability risk
  • ✕Public company registry reduces anonymity
  • ✕Asset protection framework weaker than dedicated offshore jurisdictions
🇧🇧
Barbados
IBC  ·  Treaty Network
3.6
Overall
Tax Efficiency
4
Asset Protection
3
Privacy
3
Treaty Access
4
Ease of Setup
4
Strengths
  • ✓1-5.5% effective rate for IBCs on foreign income
  • ✓Canada-Barbados treaty, significant for Canadian-controlled structures
  • ✓English common law; established IBC infrastructure
Weaknesses
  • ✕CRA scrutinises mind and management closely, substance essential
  • ✕OECD BEPS compliance reducing IBC advantages
  • ✕Limited treaty network outside Canada and CARICOM
🇰🇳
Nevis
LLC & Trust  ·  Asset Protection
4.2
Overall
Tax Efficiency
5
Asset Protection
5
Privacy
4
Treaty Access
2
Ease of Setup
5
Strengths
  • ✓Nevis LLC: charging order as exclusive creditor remedy; among the strongest LLC protection laws globally
  • ✓2-year fraudulent transfer statute, shorter than virtually any comparable jurisdiction
  • ✓No tax on foreign-source income; no capital gains, inheritance, or wealth taxes
  • ✓No public registry of LLC members or managers, strong confidentiality
Weaknesses
  • ✕Minimal tax treaty network, not suited as a treaty access vehicle
  • ✕Small professional services market, fewer banking relationships than larger jurisdictions
  • ✕Best used in combination with other jurisdictions rather than as a standalone structure
🇲🇹
Malta
EU Holding  ·  Tax Refund Regime
3.8
Overall
Tax Efficiency
4
Asset Protection
3
Privacy
3
Treaty Access
5
Ease of Setup
4
Strengths
  • ✓35% corporate rate with 6/7 shareholder refund = effective 5%
  • ✓70+ treaties; full EU Directives access
  • ✓English language, English common law heritage
Weaknesses
  • ✕Refund mechanism complex, requires professional management
  • ✕EU beneficial ownership register
  • ✕Reputation scrutiny post-rule-of-law concerns (2019-2022)

Scores are advisory ratings reflecting general structuring suitability based on publicly available information and our practice experience. They do not constitute legal or tax advice. Jurisdictional rules change; clients should obtain current professional advice specific to their circumstances before making any structuring decisions.

Need help choosing the right jurisdiction?

Speak directly with a senior partner about the structure that fits your specific situation.

New clients accepted by referral only